Big Sky vs Jackson Hole: Your Ideal Ski Resort

If you prioritize family-friendly terrain, a range of activities, and a more extensive resort, Big Sky is your preferred destination. On the other hand, if you’re a thrill-seeker and relish the challenge of extreme skiing, Jackson Hole offers a world-class experience. 

There are many factors to know if you are going to select between Big Sky vs Jackson Hole. So, read this article to have a proper idea about these two ski resorts.

Big Sky vs Jackson Hole: A Quick Overview!

Numerous factors come into account when deciding between Big Sky vs Jackson Hole. Let’s take a closer look at these key factors.

Category Big Sky Jackson Hole
Size of Skiable Area 5,800 acres 2,500 acres
Avg. Snowfall 287 inches 306 inches
Summit Elevation 11,166 ft. 10,450 ft.
Base Elevation 7,500 ft. 6,311 ft.
Lifts 39 16
Runs 300 131
Vertical Drop 4350 vertical feet 4139 vertical feet
Ease of Access Near to Bozeman (BZN) airport Near to Jackson Hole Airport (JAC)
Mountain Vibe Unique, remote atmosphere More interesting town to explore
Terrain Endless blue terrain all over the mountain More steeper runs and advanced terrain

Big Sky vs Jackson Hole: In-Depth Comparison!

Knowing the key features of Big Sky vs Jackson Hole can assist you in making an informed choice based on your preferences. So, let’s have a detailed look.

Size of the Skiable Area and Average Snowfall

Big Sky boasts a significantly larger skiable area than Jackson Hole. However, Jackson Hole has more average snowfall than Big Sky.

Big Sky has 5,800 acres, making it one of the most expansive resorts in the United States.

 In contrast, Jackson Hole, which offers 2,500 acres of inbounds territory, falls short in terms of sheer acreage. 

However, the competitive edge for Jackson Hole lies in its exceptional average snowfall of 459 inches, making it a paradise for snow enthusiasts. 

Big Sky, with an average snowfall of 300 inches, receives less snow but compensates with a vast skiable area. 

However, if you are a beach person then you must explore some places like Palm Beach or Eagle Beach Aruba.

Summit Elevation and Base Elevation

Big Sky boasts higher summit and base elevations, standing at 11,166 ft. and 7,500 ft. respectively. In contrast, Jackson Hole, while still impressive, falls slightly short with a summit elevation of 10,450 ft. and a base elevation of 6,311 ft. 

The significant altitude differential at Big Sky ensures exhilarating, high-altitude skiing experiences. That makes it an enticing destination for those seeking the thrill of lofty peaks and deep descents.

Verticle Drops, Lifts, and Runs

Jackson Hole has the longest vertical drop in the United States and it gives a better experience than Jackson Hole.

Big Sky boasts the highest vertical drop, towering at 4,350 feet, giving avid skiers and snowboarders an exhilarating descent. On the other hand, Jackson Hole is no slouch, with a substantial vertical drop of 4,139 feet.

Big Sky offers an extensive lift network, with 39 lifts, ensuring quick access to their impressive 300 runs. While slightly shorter than Big Sky, Jackson Hole still provides an exhilarating experience. 

Jackson Hole, with its 16 lifts, may have fewer options for uphill transport but offers a more intimate atmosphere. Its 131 runs provide varied terrain, catering to skiers and snowboarders of all levels. 

Ease of Access

Both destinations are easily accessible. Big Sky offers a wider range of direct flight options while reaching Jackson Hole from the nearest airport involves a shorter commute.

Jackson Hole, while offering a quicker 30-minute commute from the airport to the slopes. 

Mountain Vibe

Jackson Hole exudes an aura of extreme skiing, a haven for thrill-seekers drawn to its steep slopes and deep powder. In contrast, Big Sky has two mountains, with the daredevils conquering Lone Peak’s extreme terrain. 

big sky overall view

Both resorts offer world-class lift systems, including iconic Aerial Trams and swift chairlifts. The choice between these two destinations ultimately hinges on the kind of mountain vibe you seek.

jackson hole overall view

As a travel enthusiast, you can also explore places like the Getty Museum and Getty Villa.

Terrain

Jackson Hole boasts some of the most extreme and challenging terrain on Earth. Big Sky, on the other hand, offers more skiable acreage and a variety of terrain. 

Jackson Hole includes steep couloirs and Corbet’s Couloir. It offers remarkable expert terrain and breathtaking views.

Big Sky is ideal for beginners with numerous green runs, while Jackson Hole is limited in green terrain. 

Both mountains offer great intermediate and advanced terrain, making them top choices for experienced skiers.

Bonus: You can explore more about Paradise Lakes and Caliente before going on a trip.

Big Sky vs Jackson Hole: Which One Is Better?

The question of whether Big Sky or Jackson Hole is better largely depends on your skiing preferences and priorities. Both resorts have their unique strengths, making them excellent choices for different types of skiers.

Big Sky stands out with its vast skiable acreage, extensive lift system, and beginner-friendly terrain. If you’re a novice skier or traveling with a family of mixed abilities, Big Sky might be the better option. 

Its abundance of green runs and well-groomed intermediate terrain provide a welcoming environment for beginners and intermediates. 

Additionally, Big Sky offers a diverse range of outdoor activities beyond skiing, such as snowshoeing, snowmobiling, and ice skating.

Conversely, Jackson Hole is renowned for its challenging and extreme terrain. If you’re an advanced or expert skier seeking thrilling adventures, Jackson Hole is the superior choice. 

The breathtaking views and iconic Aerial Tram further enhance the appeal for enthusiasts of extreme skiing.

Conclusion

Now you know all about Big Sky vs Jackson Hole ski resorts.

The choice between Big Sky and Jackson Hole truly comes down to your skiing proficiency and your desired mountain adventure.

Scroll to Top